Vaccinated Blood Transfusion Kills Baby Who Was Anemic, Large Clot from Leg to Heart

 stock here: is it correct to be concerned with the vaxxed "shedding" on you, and even worse, vaxxed
blood transfusion?    We suspected so, and it is now playing out. 

Murdering babies after birth, might as well just have aborted them.

1. A newborn baby boy named Alex was born in Washington state with a 95% survivable congenital heart defect and was also anemic and needed a blood transfusion. pic.twitter.com/rOZ5DsQheH

— Defeat The Mandates (@dchomecoming) December 14, 2022

This came from this substack.....check it out, and check out the comment section.

https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/uk-scientist-reveals-bombshell-data/comment/4057962 

 

Dr Mike Yeadon Mar 10, 2022 That’s a great question. In a word, arrogance. Possibly also they don’t care if their schemes are uncovered, so long as they can oppress, censor & smear all involved Also, repeated, prior failure to uncover what are to me even more obvious evidence of frauds. For example, if the public think about it at all, one of the critical, foundational lies required for the entire enterprise to function, “asymptomatic transmission”, is trivially easy to expose. Having done so, It’s not got us all much traction. Yet without AT, all the “measures” look as silly & ineffectual as they are (masking, mass testing, social distancing, border restrictions, even vaccine passports & more). Whether these failures arise because they’re hard to detect (unless this is one’s field of expertise), hard to communicate to others or for other reasons, the sad position is that, two years in, almost nothing about the wider fraud is known to the public. On c19 batch variability in toxicity, I’ve been astonished to realise that several people on the same side have looked at the same data & declared that there’s nothing to see here. I don’t think they’re moles. They just look at & think about the evidence differently. I know some start with the assumption that normal manufacturing standards have been met, so their null hypocrisy is very different from mine. So I believe the perpetrators sense that they can do pretty much whatever they want & too few people to matter will call them out on it. I will say that the emergence of a former Wall Street analyst in Ed Dowd seems to me to be a far from obvious development. Fingers crossed anyway! Cheers Mike