Senior-Cide 2020, 85.6% of the Murdered Seniors Were in Just 23 Bad Actor States, I have the Data, State by State, Downloadable Table

stock here

119,196 Total Deaths "With COVID"

54,882 Of those deaths were at Nursing Homes.   46% of all COVID Deaths were at Nursing Homes!

Of those 54,882 NH Deaths, 46,981 were in "Bad Actor States", These are 23 States with

85.6% of the Nursing Home Deaths.  Many of these states forced COVID positive people into Nursing Homes.

They "needed the deaths".

Out of all the reported deaths, 46,981 were in Nursing Homes in Bad States, highlighted in yellow.

So 40% of all the Death reported, was in Nursing Homes in Bad States 

You want the Excel, and backup, it's here!
granny gate state data 062820.xlsx 

--------------------------------------------------------

Listen to Dr. Elaine Healy, Vice Pres of Medical Affairs at a nursing home describe the frustration with the order and that no state health official would return her calls.




Did you really have to MURDER GRANNY IN THE WORST POSSIBLE WAY?   Suffocating and no loved ones around?

Thomas Sowell on the Myths of Economic Inequality --"Government is not the personification of the national interest. They have their own interests." An incredibly important statement.

This one is kind of long but there are some great points made.

He was a former marxist, and took decades to get past that.

"Government is not the personification of the national interest. They have their own interests." An incredibly important statement.

BLM Donations Do Not Go To Help Black People, They Go To Fund Dem / Socialist Campaigns

I will throw out an assertation, or is that an assertion?

Democrats talk up how they are "for blacks" but their policies do not end up in actually helping

blacks.   That should be obvious without need for any backup just by looking at the decades of Dem controlled cities, but especially in combination with Dem Governors.

But let's get to the facts.

When you go to the main BLM website, here, and click on the donate button....

https://blacklivesmatter.com/

It takes you to here.   ActBlue.   Blue being Democrats of course.

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ms_blm_homepage_2019

 OK, so far so good.

Now how does ActBlue disperse it's money?

You can find that here:


https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cmte=C00401224&cycle=2020

It is interesting that there are over $2.5M of "UN-Classifiable Expenses" which is odd.    I mean I have run businesses since 1988, and my own since 2001 and all expenses go into a category.   There is nothing that is "unclassifiable" unless perhaps you are hiring shady operatives????

But check the last image.....$186M to Bernie....they wanted the Socialist.  And he was an obvious loser, they then gave $119M Joe (God is the 'thing') Biden.  

And a good writeup on a crucial question.....what else does ActBlue spend their money on......answer is....on social issues, if the politicians refuse to accept their donation.     Wow.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItsModeloTimeFoo/comments/h13go6/blm_and_actblue_where_is_the_money_going/

UC Berkeley History Professor's Open Letter Against BLM, Police Brutality and Cultural Orthodoxy

 

Excellently written, not quite “tart” enough for my in their face rantiness, but maybe one that a normie might read, although I doubt they will.    They will quickly see that this is going to go against “their beliefs and feelings” and just bypass it.

Stock out.

noted: The official response from Berkeley, so tone deaf they cannot even hear themselves scream
"raycist!"   

An anonymous letter has been circulating, purportedly written by a @UCBHistory professor. We have no evidence that this letter was written by a History faculty member. We condemn this letter: it goes against our values as a department and our commitment to equity and inclusion.

— UC Berkeley History (@UCBHistory) June 13, 2020

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 2020

UC Berkeley History Professor's Open Letter Against BLM, Police Brutality and Cultural Orthodoxy via Tracy Beanz on Twitter

Dear profs X, Y, Z

I am one of your colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley. I have met you both personally but do not know you closely, and am contacting you anonymously, with apologies. I am worried that writing this email publicly might lead to me losing my job, and likely all future jobs in my field.
In your recent departmental emails you mentioned our pledge to diversity, but I am increasingly alarmed by the absence of diversity of opinion on the topic of the recent protests and our community response to them.

In the extended links and resources you provided, I could not find a single instance of substantial counter-argument or alternative narrative to explain the under-representation of black individuals in academia or their over-representation in the criminal justice system. The explanation provided in your documentation, to the near exclusion of all others, is univariate: the problems of the black community are caused by whites, or, when whites are not physically present, by the infiltration of white supremacy and white systemic racism into American brains, souls, and institutions.

Many cogent objections to this thesis have been raised by sober voices, including from within the black community itself, such as Thomas Sowell and Wilfred Reilly. These people are not racists or 'Uncle Toms'. They are intelligent scholars who reject a narrative that strips black people of agency and systematically externalizes the problems of the black community onto outsiders. Their view is entirely absent from the departmental and UCB-wide communiques.

The claim that the difficulties that the black community faces are entirely causally explained by exogenous factors in the form of white systemic racism, white supremacy, and other forms of white discrimination remains a problematic hypothesis that should be vigorously challenged by historians. Instead, it is being treated as an axiomatic and actionable truth without serious consideration of its profound flaws, or its worrying implication of total black impotence. This hypothesis is transforming our institution and our culture, without any space for dissent outside of a tightly policed, narrow discourse.
A counternarrative exists. If you have time, please consider examining some of the documents I attach at the end of this email. Overwhelmingly, the reasoning provided by BLM and allies is either primarily anecdotal (as in the case with the bulk of Ta-Nehisi Coates' undeniably moving article) or it is transparently motivated. As an example of the latter problem, consider the proportion of black incarcerated Americans. This proportion is often used to characterize the criminal justice system as anti-black. However, if we use the precise same methodology, we would have to conclude that the criminal justice system is even more anti-male than it is anti-black.

Would we characterize criminal justice as a systemically misandrist conspiracy against innocent American men? I hope you see that this type of reasoning is flawed, and requires a significant suspension of our rational faculties. Black people are not incarcerated at higher rates than their involvement in violent crime would predict. This fact has been demonstrated multiple times across multiple jurisdictions in multiple countries.

And yet, I see my department uncritically reproducing a narrative that diminishes black agency in favor of a white-centric explanation that appeals to the department's apparent desire to shoulder the 'white man窶冱 burden' and to promote a narrative of white guilt.

If we claim that the criminal justice system is white-supremacist, why is it that Asian Americans, Indian Americans, and Nigerian Americans are incarcerated at vastly lower rates than white Americans? This is a funny sort of white supremacy. Even Jewish Americans are incarcerated less than gentile whites. I think it's fair to say that your average white supremacist disapproves of Jews. And yet, these alleged white supremacists incarcerate gentiles at vastly higher rates than Jews. None of this is addressed in your literature. None of this is explained, beyond hand-waving and ad hominems. "Those are racist dogwhistles". "The model minority myth is white supremacist". "Only fascists talk about black-on-black crime", ad nauseam.

These types of statements do not amount to counterarguments: they are simply arbitrary offensive classifications, intended to silence and oppress discourse. Any serious historian will recognize these for the silencing orthodoxy tactics they are, common to suppressive regimes, doctrines, and religions throughout time and space. They are intended to crush real diversity and permanently exile the culture of robust criticism from our department.
Increasingly, we are being called upon to comply and subscribe to BLM's problematic view of history, and the department is being presented as unified on the matter. In particular, ethnic minorities are being aggressively marshaled into a single position. Any apparent unity is surely a function of the fact that dissent could almost certainly lead to expulsion or cancellation for those of us in a precarious position, which is no small number.
I personally don't dare speak out against the BLM narrative, and with this barrage of alleged unity being mass-produced by the administration, tenured professoriat, the UC administration, corporate America, and the media, the punishment for dissent is a clear danger at a time of widespread economic vulnerability. I am certain that if my name were attached to this email, I would lose my job and all future jobs, even though I believe in and can justify every word I type.

The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble, while white violence requires explanation and demands solution. Please look into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is.

No discussion is permitted for nonblack victims of black violence, who proportionally outnumber black victims of nonblack violence. This is especially bitter in the Bay Area, where Asian victimization by black assailants has reached epidemic proportions, to the point that the SF police chief has advised Asians to stop hanging good-luck charms on their doors, as this attracts the attention of (overwhelmingly black) home invaders. Home invaders like George Floyd. For this actual, lived, physically experienced reality of violence in the USA, there are no marches, no tearful emails from departmental heads, no support from McDonald's and Wal-Mart. For the History department, our silence is not a mere abrogation of our duty to shed light on the truth: it is a rejection of it.

The claim that black intraracial violence is the product of redlining, slavery, and other injustices is a largely historical claim. It is for historians, therefore, to explain why Japanese internment or the massacre of European Jewry hasn't led to equivalent rates of dysfunction and low SES performance among Japanese and Jewish Americans respectively. Arab Americans have been viciously demonized since 9/11, as have Chinese Americans more recently. However, both groups outperform white Americans on nearly all SES indices - as do Nigerian Americans, who incidentally have black skin. It is for historians to point out and discuss these anomalies. However, no real discussion is possible in the current climate at our department. The explanation is provided to us, disagreement with it is racist, and the job of historians is to further explore additional ways in which the explanation is additionally correct. This is a mockery of the historical profession.

Most troublingly, our department appears to have been entirely captured by the interests of the Democratic National Convention, and the Democratic Party more broadly. To explain what I mean, consider what happens if you choose to donate to Black Lives Matter, an organization UCB History has explicitly promoted in its recent mailers. All donations to the official BLM website are immediately redirected to ActBlue Charities, an organization primarily concerned with bankrolling election campaigns for Democrat candidates. Donating to BLM today is to indirectly donate to Joe Biden's 2020 campaign. This is grotesque given the fact that the American cities with the worst rates of black-on-black violence and police-on-black violence are overwhelmingly Democrat-run. Minneapolis itself has been entirely in the hands of Democrats for over five decades; the 'systemic racism' there was built by successive Democrat administrations.

The patronizing and condescending attitudes of Democrat leaders towards the black community, exemplified by nearly every Biden statement on the black race, all but guarantee a perpetual state of misery, resentment, poverty, and the attendant grievance politics which are simultaneously annihilating American political discourse and black lives. And yet, donating to BLM is bankrolling the election campaigns of men like Mayor Frey, who saw their cities devolve into violence. This is a grotesque capture of a good-faith movement for necessary police reform, and of our department, by a political party. Even worse, there are virtually no avenues for dissent in academic circles. I refuse to serve the Party, and so should you.

The total alliance of major corporations involved in human exploitation with BLM should be a warning flag to us, and yet this damning evidence goes unnoticed, purposefully ignored, or perversely celebrated. We are the useful idiots of the wealthiest classes, carrying water for Jeff Bezos and other actual, real, modern-day slavers. Starbucks, an organisation using literal black slaves in its coffee plantation suppliers, is in favor of BLM. Sony, an organisation using cobalt mined by yet more literal black slaves, many of whom are children, is in favor of BLM. And so, apparently, are we. The absence of counter-narrative enables this obscenity. Fiat lux, indeed.

There also exists a large constituency of what can only be called 'race hustlers': hucksters of all colors who benefit from stoking the fires of racial conflict to secure administrative jobs, charity management positions, academic jobs and advancement, or personal political entrepreneurship.

Given the direction our history department appears to be taking far from any commitment to truth, we can regard ourselves as a formative training institution for this brand of snake-oil salespeople. Their activities are corrosive, demolishing any hope at harmonious racial coexistence in our nation and colonizing our political and institutional life. Many of their voices are unironically segregationist.

MLK would likely be called an Uncle Tom if he spoke on our campus today. We are training leaders who intend, explicitly, to destroy one of the only truly successful ethnically diverse societies in modern history. As the PRC, an ethnonationalist and aggressively racially chauvinist national polity with null immigration and no concept of jus solis increasingly presents itself as the global political alternative to the US, I ask you: Is this wise? Are we really doing the right thing?

As a final point, our university and department has made multiple statements celebrating and eulogizing George Floyd. Floyd was a multiple felon who once held a pregnant black woman at gunpoint. He broke into her home with a gang of men and pointed a gun at her pregnant stomach. He terrorized the women in his community. He sired and abandoned multiple children, playing no part in their support or upbringing, failing one of the most basic tests of decency for a human being. He was a drug-addict and sometime drug-dealer, a swindler who preyed upon his honest and hard-working neighbors.
And yet, the regents of UC and the historians of the UCB History department are celebrating this violent criminal, elevating his name to virtual sainthood. A man who hurt women. A man who hurt black women. With the full collaboration of the UCB history department, corporate America, most mainstream media outlets, and some of the wealthiest and most privileged opinion-shaping elites of the USA, he has become a culture hero, buried in a golden casket, his (recognized) family showered with gifts and praise. Americans are being socially pressured into kneeling for this violent, abusive misogynist. A generation of black men are being coerced into identifying with George Floyd, the absolute worst specimen of our race and species.

I'm ashamed of my department. I would say that I'm ashamed of both of you, but perhaps you agree with me, and are simply afraid, as I am, of the backlash of speaking the truth. It's hard to know what kneeling means, when you have to kneel to keep your job.

It shouldn't affect the strength of my argument above, but for the record, I write as a person of color. My family have been personally victimized by men like Floyd. We are aware of the condescending depredations of the Democrat party against our race. The humiliating assumption that we are too stupid to do STEM, that we need special help and lower requirements to get ahead in life, is richly familiar to us. I sometimes wonder if it wouldn't be easier to deal with open fascists, who at least would be straightforward in calling me a subhuman, and who are unlikely to share my race.

The ever-present soft bigotry of low expectations and the permanent claim that the solutions to the plight of my people rest exclusively on the goodwill of whites rather than on our own hard work is psychologically devastating. No other group in America is systematically demoralized in this way by its alleged allies. A whole generation of black children are being taught that only by begging and weeping and screaming will they get handouts from guilt-ridden whites.

No message will more surely devastate their futures, especially if whites run out of guilt, or indeed if America runs out of whites. If this had been done to Japanese Americans, or Jewish Americans, or Chinese Americans, then Chinatown and Japantown would surely be no different to the roughest parts of Baltimore and East St. Louis today. The History department of UCB is now an integral institutional promulgator of a destructive and denigrating fallacy about the black race.

I hope you appreciate the frustration behind this message. I do not support BLM. I do not support the Democrat grievance agenda and the Party's uncontested capture of our department. I do not support the Party co-opting my race, as Biden recently did in his disturbing interview, claiming that voting Democrat and being black are isomorphic. I condemn the manner of George Floyd's death and join you in calling for greater police accountability and police reform. However, I will not pretend that George Floyd was anything other than a violent misogynist, a brutal man who met a predictably brutal end.
I also want to protect the practice of history. Cleo is no grovelling handmaiden to politicians and corporations. Like us, she is free.

SAR-2 Plandemic, and the Floyd World Tour Race War, And the (5) Next Events......

Gotta keep a close eye on those Jesuits……LOL

My next update will upset quite a few people, probably lose them entirely……let me run it by you first……

Some of you are not going to like this, it’s combination of research, intuition, and more research.

It may be hard for some of you to accept that there are those who would be okay with intentionally killing tens of thousands of elderly, in the worst way possible….”I can’t breath” while hooked up to a ventilator and haven’t seen family in weeks….granny gate.   Would they also intentionally crash the economy, possibly still leading to over a hundred thousand additional deaths, and then either do or simulate a murder on film, a slow snuff film in order to incite unrest, further destruction of businesses that would already hobbled by COVID, and spur on a “race war”….read on my intrepid truth seekers of cognitive dissonance.

If you need help on seeing on how COVID was over promoted, over blown, let me know.    I think that should already be more than obvious, but if you are listening just to establishment media, you may not have the real picture.  

George Floyd was not a good man.    So you have to ask yourself, why are politicians and “news” agencies making him out to be a  saint who brought joy to those around him?

On the day, May 25^th that COVID Deaths dropped 80% off the peak, The Floyd Event occurred.

https://deeperdivedata.blogspot.com/2020/06/usa-covid-deaths-drop-80-from-peak-and.html

Floyd had a long rap sheet, like 10 convictions.    This includes drug use and drug dealing, and he was reported to be on Fentanyl and Meta Amphetamine at the “Floyd Event”.    The stint that put him in a Texas jail for 5 years was that he home invaded a pregnant black woman, looking to steal drugs, money, any thing they could get.   Once inside he let 4 buddies in also.    He put a gun to the pregnant womans belly and said if she held anything back for any valuables, he would kill the baby inside of her.

He worked at the same bar as Derek Chauvin as bouncers.     Chauvin as an experienced cop was making around $90,000 a year plus good benefits.   Why then did he work at a Bar making $15 /H for 17 years?    That answer should become obvious once you think about it.    His wife was a beauty queen, who was a former child bride to a man in Eau Claire, WI (Larry you better come clean on this!)

The bar owner tried to sell the idea that Chauvin was “a racist” who treated blacks poorly and had a hot head….ya, but she continuously employed him for 17 years…..in other words, she was in on “it” too and was trying to sell the racist cop story, per all their handlers.  

Here is a possible scenario, and quite a bit of backup

https://deeperdivedata.blogspot.com/2020/06/drug-dealer-cop-in-minneapolis-extorted.html

Floyd family hires same Doctor who presided over Epstein’s “event”, and then Floyd’s Gold plated closed coffin goes on “tour”.   It would be interesting to see who paid for the gold plated coffin, and if the family was paid something to allow this ©parade to go on.

The police precinct was 1 block from the bar, El Nuevo Rodeo.    The mayor of Minneapolis, tells the police to abandon the precinct.    And they burn it to  the ground.    And they also burn El Nuevo Rodeo to the ground.    There was not widespread burning in Minneapolis, but the burned “the evidence” to the ground.   All the players social media had been purged prior to “the event”.

So The Obama Foundation Was Promoting George Floyd's Picture on May 16, 2020, 9 Days Before He Was "Killed"

https://deeperdivedata.blogspot.com/2020/06/httpswwwnukepronet202006so-obama.html

It’s all just a coincidence, as Flynn is exonerated, HRC forced to testify under oath, Rosenstein testifies, and 30 other Obama era peeps are called to testify.

So the question is, what’s next

COVID-19

RIOTS/RACE WARS

COVID-19 RELAPSE

BIDEN TRAGIC DEATH

BLACK HORSE EMERGES

BRING BACK HOPE CAMPAIGN

MAIL-IN VOTER FRAUD

[D] PARTY RECLAIMS WH

CRIMINALS BACK IN CONTROL, history can be re-written, evidence destroyed.

The tyrants that be seems to have some game, especially with total control of the media, and a dumbed down complacent audience.

Last week I predicted that COVID will be back and worse than ever (at least the news stories).    But they will have trouble juicing that much.  

There will be scare stories of "the COVID effects of the protests will not be known" yet, ever, LOL.

It seems one of their strategies is to totally dominate the news cycle.   I mean besides the weather, have you heard any other news at all?   

To do accomplish this, COVID will not be enough.     So how about a "real" false flag?    Say a Antifa picks a fight with a National Guard and get put down hard, then two Antifa's attack with firearms, from dispersed locations.    Setting off the pack mentality of the Guard, who responds by wiping out 15 people.....and best yet if they are mostly black, but a token White and Asian and Hispanic in there (you know the same demographics of the Floyd "murderers"), so hate can be well dispersed.   

Then, the news cycle kicks in....disarm the National Guard!!!    End their deployment!!   

We need a revolution!!    There is no going back to the old normal, we need a new normal.  

   

 More pervasive "assistance" by social welfare groups, 

• psychological "assistance" to those who have trouble grok-ing the new normal including mandatory drug injections.    
• Parents aren't bad, they just need “help” in knowing how to raise their kids, 
• so monthly visitations in the home and 
• talking to the kids separately to make sure there is no abuse.    
• "Assessment" of kids who have been being home schooled.

 This is where we are at folks.    It's time to win.